NAACP LDF Assistant Counsel Cara McClellan on Racially Disproportionate Discipline in Our Schools  

 MoFo’s Diversity Strategy Committee recently hosted a special panel presentation to round out our celebration of Black History Month, featuring NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund (LDF) Assistant Counsel Cara McClellan. Prior to joining LDF, Cara’s career path included teaching middle school with Teach America, and clerking in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

In her current role, Cara has been representing Black students and parents in a number of ongoing school desegregation cases, including Thomas v. St. Martin Parish, La. School Board and the landmark Connecticut Sheff v. O’Neill case, and in the Maryland school finance lawsuit, Bradford v. Maryland State Board of Education. 

San Francisco Litigation partner Josh Hill moderated the conversation which centered on the headline-grabbing I.S. v. Binghamton School District case, which is challenging the discriminatory strip search of four middle school girls with MoFo as pro bono co-counsel. In addition to Josh, other members of the MoFo team working on the matter include Litigation partner Jamie Levitt and associates Chanwoo Park and Amanda Gayer.

Filed on April 29, 2019, the complaint alleges that the intrusive strip search of four 12-year-old Black and Latina girls was racially motivated. The incident occurred at a middle school in Binghamton, New York, after the girls were seen talking and laughing in the hallway during their lunch period by the school principle and assistant principle, who described them as being “hyper and giddy.”

The school officials then escorted the girls to the health office where they directed the school nurse to conduct intrusive and demeaning searches of the girls, even instructing some of them to remove layers of clothing and physically touching their bodies. Furthermore, these searches were allowed by the school officials without ever notifying or obtaining consent from the girls’ parents. After the parent’s initial complaints, the Binghamton school district failed to rectify the situation and refused to issue an apology for the girls’ mistreatment at the hands of the school’s principal, assistant principal, and school nurse.

When speaking about why LDF took on this case, Cara noted that “it embodied a lot of patterns that we’re seeing nationally in terms of how Black and Brown students are singled out for treatment as if they are engaged in suspicious or illegal behavior, simply because they are doing things that children, or teenagers, or adolescents often do.”

According to a study, Black girls are often viewed by educators as “more suspicious, mature, provocative, and aggressive than their white peers,” and girls “as young as five were viewed by adults as less innocent than white girls,” which creates an “adultification bias” that leads to Black girls being disproportionately disciplined in schools, something the Binghamton lawsuit hopes to highlight and change.

In September 2020, a Syracuse, New York judge granted the school district’s motion to dismiss the race discrimination charge, noting that the case could go forward on unlawful search claims. According to The New York Times article, “A Battle for the Souls of Black Girls,”* this decision was made in part “because the complaint’s data was not recent or granular enough to show that administrators targeted the girls because of their race,” further noting that the judge concluded that the “defects in plaintiffs’ complaint” were technical and that a “better pleading could cure them.”

See more from Josh and Cara’s conversation in the clips below:

 

 

*Subscription may be required to read this article.